On April 11, 2025, a U.S. immigration judge ruled that Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian organizer and Columbia University graduate, is eligible for deportation based on his political beliefs. The decision relies on a memo from Secretary of State Marco Rubio stating that Khalil’s “current or expected beliefs, statements or associations” oppose U.S. foreign policy interests. Notably, the memo contains no allegations of criminal conduct. Judge Jamee Comans emphasized that immigration courts lack the authority to override foreign policy decisions, asserting that Rubio’s determination is “presumptive and sufficient evidence” for removal.
Khalil’s legal team argues that the proceedings violate his First Amendment rights and due process, labeling the hearing a “charade.” They are appealing the decision and seeking his release on bail in New Jersey, where a separate federal case is examining the constitutionality of deporting individuals based on protected speech. A federal judge in New Jersey has temporarily barred Khalil’s deportation pending the outcome of this case.
The ruling has sparked widespread condemnation from civil liberties advocates and free speech defenders. Critics argue that deporting a lawful permanent resident for expressing political views sets a dangerous precedent and undermines democratic values. Protests have erupted across the country, with supporters demanding Khalil’s release and decrying what they see as an erosion of constitutional protections.
Khalil has been detained since March 8 following an ICE arrest. His wife, who is expecting their child soon, and supporters have pledged continued advocacy, emphasizing the broader implications of his case for free speech and immigrant rights in the United States.